api-design
REST API design patterns including resource naming, status codes, pagination, filtering, error responses, versioning, and rate limiting for production APIs.
API Design Patterns
Conventions and best practices for designing consistent, developer-friendly REST APIs.
When to Activate
- Designing new API endpoints
- Reviewing existing API contracts
- Adding pagination, filtering, or sorting
- Implementing error handling for APIs
- Planning API versioning strategy
- Building public or partner-facing APIs
Resource Design
URL Structure
# Resources are nouns, plural, lowercase, kebab-caseGET /api/v1/usersGET /api/v1/users/:idPOST /api/v1/usersPUT /api/v1/users/:idPATCH /api/v1/users/:idDELETE /api/v1/users/:id
# Sub-resources for relationshipsGET /api/v1/users/:id/ordersPOST /api/v1/users/:id/orders
# Actions that don't map to CRUD (use verbs sparingly)POST /api/v1/orders/:id/cancelPOST /api/v1/auth/loginPOST /api/v1/auth/refreshNaming Rules
# GOOD/api/v1/team-members # kebab-case for multi-word resources/api/v1/orders?status=active # query params for filtering/api/v1/users/123/orders # nested resources for ownership
# BAD/api/v1/getUsers # verb in URL/api/v1/user # singular (use plural)/api/v1/team_members # snake_case in URLs/api/v1/users/123/getOrders # verb in nested resourceHTTP Methods and Status Codes
Method Semantics
| Method | Idempotent | Safe | Use For |
|---|---|---|---|
| GET | Yes | Yes | Retrieve resources |
| POST | No | No | Create resources, trigger actions |
| PUT | Yes | No | Full replacement of a resource |
| PATCH | No* | No | Partial update of a resource |
| DELETE | Yes | No | Remove a resource |
*PATCH can be made idempotent with proper implementation
Status Code Reference
# Success200 OK — GET, PUT, PATCH (with response body)201 Created — POST (include Location header)204 No Content — DELETE, PUT (no response body)
# Client Errors400 Bad Request — Validation failure, malformed JSON401 Unauthorized — Missing or invalid authentication403 Forbidden — Authenticated but not authorized404 Not Found — Resource doesn't exist409 Conflict — Duplicate entry, state conflict422 Unprocessable Entity — Semantically invalid (valid JSON, bad data)429 Too Many Requests — Rate limit exceeded
# Server Errors500 Internal Server Error — Unexpected failure (never expose details)502 Bad Gateway — Upstream service failed503 Service Unavailable — Temporary overload, include Retry-AfterCommon Mistakes
# BAD: 200 for everything{ "status": 200, "success": false, "error": "Not found" }
# GOOD: Use HTTP status codes semanticallyHTTP/1.1 404 Not Found{ "error": { "code": "not_found", "message": "User not found" } }
# BAD: 500 for validation errors# GOOD: 400 or 422 with field-level details
# BAD: 200 for created resources# GOOD: 201 with Location headerHTTP/1.1 201 CreatedLocation: /api/v1/users/abc-123Response Format
Success Response
{ "data": { "id": "abc-123", "email": "alice@example.com", "name": "Alice", "created_at": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z" }}Collection Response (with Pagination)
{ "data": [ { "id": "abc-123", "name": "Alice" }, { "id": "def-456", "name": "Bob" } ], "meta": { "total": 142, "page": 1, "per_page": 20, "total_pages": 8 }, "links": { "self": "/api/v1/users?page=1&per_page=20", "next": "/api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20", "last": "/api/v1/users?page=8&per_page=20" }}Error Response
{ "error": { "code": "validation_error", "message": "Request validation failed", "details": [ { "field": "email", "message": "Must be a valid email address", "code": "invalid_format" }, { "field": "age", "message": "Must be between 0 and 150", "code": "out_of_range" } ] }}Response Envelope Variants
// Option A: Envelope with data wrapper (recommended for public APIs)interface ApiResponse<T> { data: T; meta?: PaginationMeta; links?: PaginationLinks;}
interface ApiError { error: { code: string; message: string; details?: FieldError[]; };}
// Option B: Flat response (simpler, common for internal APIs)// Success: just return the resource directly// Error: return error object// Distinguish by HTTP status codePagination
Offset-Based (Simple)
GET /api/v1/users?page=2&per_page=20
# ImplementationSELECT * FROM usersORDER BY created_at DESCLIMIT 20 OFFSET 20;Pros: Easy to implement, supports “jump to page N” Cons: Slow on large offsets (OFFSET 100000), inconsistent with concurrent inserts
Cursor-Based (Scalable)
GET /api/v1/users?cursor=eyJpZCI6MTIzfQ&limit=20
# ImplementationSELECT * FROM usersWHERE id > :cursor_idORDER BY id ASCLIMIT 21; -- fetch one extra to determine has_next{ "data": [...], "meta": { "has_next": true, "next_cursor": "eyJpZCI6MTQzfQ" }}Pros: Consistent performance regardless of position, stable with concurrent inserts Cons: Cannot jump to arbitrary page, cursor is opaque
When to Use Which
| Use Case | Pagination Type |
|---|---|
| Admin dashboards, small datasets (<10K) | Offset |
| Infinite scroll, feeds, large datasets | Cursor |
| Public APIs | Cursor (default) with offset (optional) |
| Search results | Offset (users expect page numbers) |
Filtering, Sorting, and Search
Filtering
# Simple equalityGET /api/v1/orders?status=active&customer_id=abc-123
# Comparison operators (use bracket notation)GET /api/v1/products?price[gte]=10&price[lte]=100GET /api/v1/orders?created_at[after]=2025-01-01
# Multiple values (comma-separated)GET /api/v1/products?category=electronics,clothing
# Nested fields (dot notation)GET /api/v1/orders?customer.country=USSorting
# Single field (prefix - for descending)GET /api/v1/products?sort=-created_at
# Multiple fields (comma-separated)GET /api/v1/products?sort=-featured,price,-created_atFull-Text Search
# Search query parameterGET /api/v1/products?q=wireless+headphones
# Field-specific searchGET /api/v1/users?email=aliceSparse Fieldsets
# Return only specified fields (reduces payload)GET /api/v1/users?fields=id,name,emailGET /api/v1/orders?fields=id,total,status&include=customer.nameAuthentication and Authorization
Token-Based Auth
# Bearer token in Authorization headerGET /api/v1/usersAuthorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIs...
# API key (for server-to-server)GET /api/v1/dataX-API-Key: sk_live_abc123Authorization Patterns
// Resource-level: check ownershipapp.get("/api/v1/orders/:id", async (req, res) => { const order = await Order.findById(req.params.id); if (!order) return res.status(404).json({ error: { code: "not_found" } }); if (order.userId !== req.user.id) return res.status(403).json({ error: { code: "forbidden" } }); return res.json({ data: order });});
// Role-based: check permissionsapp.delete("/api/v1/users/:id", requireRole("admin"), async (req, res) => { await User.delete(req.params.id); return res.status(204).send();});Rate Limiting
Headers
HTTP/1.1 200 OKX-RateLimit-Limit: 100X-RateLimit-Remaining: 95X-RateLimit-Reset: 1640000000
# When exceededHTTP/1.1 429 Too Many RequestsRetry-After: 60{ "error": { "code": "rate_limit_exceeded", "message": "Rate limit exceeded. Try again in 60 seconds." }}Rate Limit Tiers
| Tier | Limit | Window | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anonymous | 30/min | Per IP | Public endpoints |
| Authenticated | 100/min | Per user | Standard API access |
| Premium | 1000/min | Per API key | Paid API plans |
| Internal | 10000/min | Per service | Service-to-service |
Versioning
URL Path Versioning (Recommended)
/api/v1/users/api/v2/usersPros: Explicit, easy to route, cacheable Cons: URL changes between versions
Header Versioning
GET /api/usersAccept: application/vnd.myapp.v2+jsonPros: Clean URLs Cons: Harder to test, easy to forget
Versioning Strategy
1. Start with /api/v1/ — don't version until you need to2. Maintain at most 2 active versions (current + previous)3. Deprecation timeline: - Announce deprecation (6 months notice for public APIs) - Add Sunset header: Sunset: Sat, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT - Return 410 Gone after sunset date4. Non-breaking changes don't need a new version: - Adding new fields to responses - Adding new optional query parameters - Adding new endpoints5. Breaking changes require a new version: - Removing or renaming fields - Changing field types - Changing URL structure - Changing authentication methodImplementation Patterns
TypeScript (Next.js API Route)
import { z } from "zod";import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from "next/server";
const createUserSchema = z.object({ email: z.string().email(), name: z.string().min(1).max(100),});
export async function POST(req: NextRequest) { const body = await req.json(); const parsed = createUserSchema.safeParse(body);
if (!parsed.success) { return NextResponse.json({ error: { code: "validation_error", message: "Request validation failed", details: parsed.error.issues.map(i => ({ field: i.path.join("."), message: i.message, code: i.code, })), }, }, { status: 422 }); }
const user = await createUser(parsed.data);
return NextResponse.json( { data: user }, { status: 201, headers: { Location: `/api/v1/users/${user.id}` }, }, );}Python (Django REST Framework)
from rest_framework import serializers, viewsets, statusfrom rest_framework.response import Response
class CreateUserSerializer(serializers.Serializer): email = serializers.EmailField() name = serializers.CharField(max_length=100)
class UserSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): class Meta: model = User fields = ["id", "email", "name", "created_at"]
class UserViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet): serializer_class = UserSerializer permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]
def get_serializer_class(self): if self.action == "create": return CreateUserSerializer return UserSerializer
def create(self, request): serializer = CreateUserSerializer(data=request.data) serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True) user = UserService.create(**serializer.validated_data) return Response( {"data": UserSerializer(user).data}, status=status.HTTP_201_CREATED, headers={"Location": f"/api/v1/users/{user.id}"}, )Go (net/http)
func (h *UserHandler) CreateUser(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { var req CreateUserRequest if err := json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&req); err != nil { writeError(w, http.StatusBadRequest, "invalid_json", "Invalid request body") return }
if err := req.Validate(); err != nil { writeError(w, http.StatusUnprocessableEntity, "validation_error", err.Error()) return }
user, err := h.service.Create(r.Context(), req) if err != nil { switch { case errors.Is(err, domain.ErrEmailTaken): writeError(w, http.StatusConflict, "email_taken", "Email already registered") default: writeError(w, http.StatusInternalServerError, "internal_error", "Internal error") } return }
w.Header().Set("Location", fmt.Sprintf("/api/v1/users/%s", user.ID)) writeJSON(w, http.StatusCreated, map[string]any{"data": user})}API Design Checklist
Before shipping a new endpoint:
- Resource URL follows naming conventions (plural, kebab-case, no verbs)
- Correct HTTP method used (GET for reads, POST for creates, etc.)
- Appropriate status codes returned (not 200 for everything)
- Input validated with schema (Zod, Pydantic, Bean Validation)
- Error responses follow standard format with codes and messages
- Pagination implemented for list endpoints (cursor or offset)
- Authentication required (or explicitly marked as public)
- Authorization checked (user can only access their own resources)
- Rate limiting configured
- Response does not leak internal details (stack traces, SQL errors)
- Consistent naming with existing endpoints (camelCase vs snake_case)
- Documented (OpenAPI/Swagger spec updated)